The Exemplary Tale of Punitive Damages: A Sledgehammer for Justice or a Pirate with a Big Stick?

Looking for information on punitive damages? Learn about this legal concept and discover its purpose, nature, and potential impacts. Explore examples and case studies surrounding punitive damages to deepen your understanding of this important aspect of civil litigation.

The Term Punitive Damages: Explained

Introduction

Punitive damages, also known as exemplary damages, are a form of compensation awarded in a civil lawsuit. Unlike compensatory damages, which aim to make the harmed party whole again, punitive damages are meant to punish the wrongdoer for their egregious behavior and deter future misconduct.

Legal Basis

Punitive damages are primarily awarded in common law legal systems, including the United States, Canada, and many other countries. Although the specific criteria and limits vary by jurisdiction, the underlying purpose remains consistent across jurisdictions: to discourage intentional, reckless, or grossly negligent conduct.

Standard for Awarding Punitive Damages

In most cases, punitive damages are only awarded if the plaintiff can establish that the defendant acted with malice, oppression, or a conscious disregard for the safety of others. This higher standard of proof ensures that punitive damages are reserved for the most egregious cases and prevent their misuse by overly litigious parties.

Objectives of Punitive Damages

There are several key objectives behind the use of punitive damages:

• Punishment: One of the main goals of punitive damages is to penalize the defendant for their misconduct. By imposing a financial burden in addition to compensatory damages, it sends a message that such behavior will not be tolerated.
• Deterrence: Punitive damages have a deterrent effect, discouraging both the defendant and others from engaging in similar harmful actions in the future. The fear of substantial financial consequences can actively contribute to a safer society.
• Reformation: Another objective of punitive damages is to force the defendant to reevaluate their behavior and potentially take steps to change it. By imposing punitive damages, the court aims to encourage individuals and companies to adopt more responsible practices.

Criticism and Controversy

Punitive damages have faced criticism from various perspectives. Some argue that they create an unpredictable legal landscape, as the amount is often left to the discretion of the jury, potentially leading to excessive verdicts. Others argue that it can result in excessive punishment and an undue burden on defendants, particularly businesses or individuals with substantial assets.

Conclusion

Punitive damages serve a significant role in the civil justice system, ensuring accountability for the most severe wrongful conduct. While controversy surrounds their application and calculation, when applied appropriately, they can effectively discourage future misconduct and protect the rights and well-being of individuals and society at large.

Previous term: Compensatory Damages